On 2003-02-12 at 11:07:45, Joseph F. Ryan wrote: > Meaning that "I think this should be possible, but I'm not > sure if that syntax is correct, because it would mean that > the arrayrefs would need to be their own class to allow > a method to be called on it. No, they wouldn't, unless I'm missing something. All methods are called via references, right? So [@a,@b,@c].pop automatically invokes Array#pop with the invocant as the anonymous array. In fact, the only reason @foo.pop works is because @foo automatically "referencizes" in scalar context.
-- Mark REED | CNN Internet Technology 1 CNN Center Rm SW0831G | [EMAIL PROTECTED] Atlanta, GA 30348 USA | +1 404 827 4754
