Jerome Quelin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > And even toy languages may benefit from objects (yes, I really need > objects in order to implement -98 version of Befunge, especially > since I want to include concurrent-funge support). Well, I could use > my own hand-crafted objects as a list of whatever, but fun would be > much greater with objects.
Yeah, I'm waiting for objects before I have a crack at a scheme interpreter in parrot. Yeah, I *know* there's a scheme compiler in parrot but I want to do it a different way for giggles. -- Piers
