Michael G Schwern wrote in perl.qa : > On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 02:04:25PM -0500, Andy Lester wrote: >> All this "make sure no warnings fired" is good thinking. But why not >> roll it into Test::Harness, and make it switch selectable? It's >> really T::H that we want keeping an eye on this, right? > > No, its definately a test feature. Much easier to set up (no MakeMaker > muckery), finer granularity (can be done on a per test file basis rather > than a whole suite) and can distinguish between warnings and diagnostic > output (ie. warn() vs diag() vs print STDERR). > > Besides, Test::Harness can't portably trap STDERR. If you can figure out > a way to do it that would solve lots of problems. > > If you want to do it to a whole test suite, PERL5OPT=-MTest::Warn::None comes > to mind.
Provided that all test scripts are written with a Test::Warn::None-compatible plan(). -- Don't use color combinations that cause problems for people with color blindness in its various forms. -- W3C, HTML 4.01 Specification, 6.5.1
