Juergen Boemmels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The IMCC_INFO does not need to be part of the interpreter. I don't like to have global state variables around. I don't know yet, what happens if 2 interpreter threads both do eval()... >> It will be replaced by a still simple but expandable hash finally. > Ok, granted. Parrot-Strings might be a little heavy. But introducing > yet another hash implementation does not seem right to me either. We need for sure a hash with plain cstrings as keys too. The code in hash.c seems rather heavy (and slow) to me, callbacks would slow down it additionally. > bye > boe leo
