On Thu, 16 Oct 2003, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> Juergen Boemmels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > The IMCC_INFO does not need to be part of the interpreter. > > I don't like to have global state variables around. I don't know yet, > what happens if 2 interpreter threads both do eval()...
If it's per-interpreter, nothing, since each thread should have its own intepreter. (Though I can see some potential deadlock issues, though that's not specific to this)
I don't like the idea of IMCC becoming so tightly coupled with the interpreter. I still wish to be able to build it standalone. Hopefully we can keep this in mind going forward.
-Melvin
