Melvin Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Albeit I'm not convinced, that we can't have a seen hash.
> A seen hash most likely would: > 1) Kill GC performance especially in pathological cases. The GC > should be quiet and invisible. > 2) Cause memory usage to double upon a mark run. GC isn't involved. A mark() run sets the live bit in the PMCs arena. No hash is needed for both cases. I have stated several times, that I don't like to mix mark() and the other traverse functions. > -Melvin leo
