Lars Balker Rasmussen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've rewritten list.t and hash.t to use this scheme, generalizing the > layout a bit in the process.
Thanks, applied. > I'm not sure about the reasoning for one > of the interpreter setups in the old hash.t (marked with XXX), and > whether it's needed now - seems to work fine without, but that may not > be the point. I removed that. Its not needed anymore, running it via run_native now does a proper setup of the stack limit (lo_var_ptr). leo
