On Sun, 8 Feb 2004 17:27:02 -0600, Andy Lester wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 08, 2004 at 08:41:59AM -0600, Scott Bolte ([EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ) wrote:
> > I agree, but I still believe it would be good if Test::Harness
> > laid out syntax rules for extensions.
>
> There are no extensions. They're up to whoever wants to. I'm certainly
> not going to define arbitrary rules based on a sample size of one.
>
> I DO want to document the format, however, so that other languages can
> write to the T::H format reliably, and let T::H become the uber-tester.
Please let me know when you do document the format and make
sure to allow for extensions. I urge you do to so before
the sample size, and divergent extensions, gets too large.
Scott
