On Fri, 6 Feb 2004 12:22:24 -0800, Michael G Schwern wrote: > > It wouldn't be Test::Harness, it would be a seperate Test::Depends or > something.
I could live with that, but why do you think it needs to be separate? The T::H documentation makes it quite clear that there are plans to check for additional keywords (beyond /^(not )?ok/ and "Bail out!") in the future. (See the "Anything else" section.) By the way, aside from a desire to avoid lots of class layers, I stored the dependency data in the H::T::Straps object. It is that class that I'd need to augment, and since it is in Alpha mode I figured now was the time. > > P.S. Btw, I also will be requesting that the stderr output > > from tests be captured as well. > > Love to, but can't do it and still have T::H be cross-platform compatible. :( > What you can do is have your tests print your diagnostics as lines beginning > with a # to STDOUT. I believe T::H::Straps currently picks these up as > type "other" but it may change to "comment" later. I could replace Test::More::diag() with a version that uses STDOUT. Does that mean the goal of capturing STDERR listed in T::H's TODO list has been abandoned? Scott