On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 06:36:22AM -0600, Scott Bolte wrote: > On Sun, 22 Feb 2004 01:07:38 -0500, Michael G Schwern wrote: > > > > See above. Yes, ssh is not portable enough. > > Where is the gap? I have OpenSSH on every Unix platform I > use and, with cygwin's help, all the windows based systems > too. I can even log *into* a w98 host with ssh. > > Now I do agree the HTTP protocol is worth using for managing > the flow of data. I run HTTP over ssh myself. (I modified > HTTP::Daemon to use two unidirectional pipes instead of a > single, bidirectional socket.)
Has (will) that be included in future releases? Tim.
