On Mar-12, Leopold Toetsch wrote: > Steve Fink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The attached patch should remove all of the conflicts, and replace > > them with a single shift/reduce conflict that appears to be a bug in > > the actual grammar, namely: > > > x = x . x > > Ah yes. Or course, Thanks a lot, applied.
But how should the two interpretations of x.x be resolved? Is that concatenation or method calling?
