Brent 'Dax' Royal-Gordon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > How close is string_to_num() to being adequate for Parrot_sprintf()'s > purposes? (It currently falls back to the platform sprintf for floats, > because I didn't have, and still don't have, any idea how to properly > format a float.)
Well, string_to_num() is the opposite of it. And string.c has string_from_num() which is using Parrot_sprintf() ;) BTW sscanf() is missing too. leo
