On Mon, Apr 05, 2004 at 09:33:15PM -0700, chromatic wrote: > On Mon, 2004-03-29 at 23:33, chromatic wrote: > > > With the improved object system in place, I've been porting the existing > > SDL Parrot bindings. > > Here's a quick status update. With helpful suggestions from Jens and > Allison, I've just finished porting the existing files in examples/sdl > to the new libraries. They're a lot nicer.
This is probably a (dumb) parrot question rather than SDL, but I'd have expected these: > find_type app_type, 'SDL::App' > .namespace [ 'MoveLogo::EventHandler' ] to be more like find_type app_type, 'SDL', 'App' or: find_type app_type, [ 'SDL', 'App' ] .namespace [ 'MoveLogo', 'EventHandler' ] Would either/both of those work and you're just opting to have double colons 'inside' a non-nested namespace name, or am I misunderstanding how nested namespaces do/should/will work? Tim.