--- Matthew Walton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't get the reasoning here. If Yada Yada Yada is to indicate > code that you haven't written yet, it should never fail at compile > time unless it's impossible to compile the program without knowing > what that code is, so > > my int $i = ...;
Right. This goes back to the notion that lowercase basic types (int, str, bool) are "storage efficient" and therefore cannot contain values outside the domain, like C<undef>. I've argued in the past that it should be possible to put undef into lctypes, to no avail. So, since no "special" values can go into lctypes, I presume this applies to Yadda as well -- trying to stuff a Yadda object into an lctype will result in a compile time (BEGIN time, more probably) failure. =Austin
