On Tue, May 11, 2004 at 06:15:58PM -0400, stevan little wrote: > Tim, > > I see a few issues crop up with -T in the she-bang line (I made the > change to my working copy to see), but when I do 'prove -T' I see the > same issues crop up, plus then the zvpp* stuff fails (it basically > fails to load the regular test file). > > I think this makes sense, the zppp* files should not have -T in their > she-bang, since the regular test files they load already do. Would you > agree?
Yes. Tim. > Steve > > On May 11, 2004, at 6:06 PM, Tim Bunce wrote: > > >On Tue, May 11, 2004 at 01:48:47PM -0500, Andy Lester wrote: > >>On Tue, May 11, 2004 at 01:58:51PM -0400, stevan little > >>([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > >>>Should we put the -T flag in all the test files? I can do that if so. > >> > >>I'd like to. I'd like every module to think about taint-safety. DBI > >>especially, since we're dealing with tainted data if it comes from a > >>DB, > >>should be taint-aware, I think. > > > >Using "prove -T" shows they'll be some issues, but I'd suggest > >waiting till the dust has settled on the other changes. > > > >Tim. > > >
