On Thu, 24 Jun 2004, Luke Palmer wrote: > > However I wonder if an implicit stack could be provided for return()s into > > void context. It is well known that currently split() in void context has [snip] > To be honest, I have no idea what you're asking for. Might you explain > in a little more detail?
Well, something like a predefined (e.g.) @STACK variable such that something along the lines of this can work in the obvious way: 1; $_='foo bar baz'; split; # @STACK now is (1, 'foo', 'bar', 'baz'); I can imagine some uses for that... Michele -- you'll see that it shouldn't be so. AND, the writting as usuall is fantastic incompetent. To illustrate, i quote: - Xah Lee trolling on clpmisc, "perl bug File::Basename and Perl's nature"
