On Wed, 2004-06-30 at 21:33, chromatic wrote: > On Wed, 2004-06-30 at 18:18, Alexey Trofimenko wrote: > > > P.P.S. do we have a way to imply void context on function inside > > expression, something like C<scalar>, C<+>, C<~>, C<?> do? > > Sort of a 'meh' operator? > > I wonder (idly) in which circumstances the context determinator couldn't > determinate void context, though.
module foo { sub a() is export { return 1; } sub b() is export { a() } } Our Huffmanization imperative tells us that this should be a longer operator than other contextifiers, so why not just the C-like, "void"? void foo::b(); -- Aaron Sherman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Senior Systems Engineer and Perl Toolsmith http://www.ajs.com/~ajs/resume.html