> There's a whole set of these sort of problems. > > sub new { > my $proto = shift; > my $class = ref $proto || $proto;
In this case, we probably don't want that ANYWAY. That's what I did when I was through Data::Page for Leon Brocard, and it's now at 100% coverage, across the board (at least the patches I sent). > Don't be mesmerized by 100% coverage. Agreed 100% here. However, I stand by my original statement that you CAN have 100% coverage on subroutines and pod. Any disagreement on that one? > Test coverage is a useful *heuristic* for test effectiveness. Like all > heuristics if you push it too far it falls apart. Get as close to 100% as > is useful and don't worry about the rest. Words to live by. xoa -- Andy Lester => [EMAIL PROTECTED] => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance