On Mon, Jul 19, 2004 at 03:22:05AM -0400, Michael G Schwern wrote: > > The two "best" ideas we've had so far are to either run the SQL in the > > code against a temporary database, and then compare both SHOW CREATE > > TABLE outputs, or to use something like SQL::Translator to convert both > > lots of SQL to a common format. Both seem much too cumbersome, however. > > Anyone have any brighter ideas? > Don't use a temporary database, just a temporary table.
Surely that's more work? Tony
