On Fri, 20 Aug 2004 13:31:12 -0700, Larry Wall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It's vaguely possible I could be persuaded on the basis that > > for zip @a ¥ @b <-> { ($^a,$^b) = ($^b,$^a) }
Shouldn't that be: for zip @a, @b <-> { ... } --or-- for @a ¥ @b <-> { ... } ? -- matt