On Thu, 2004-11-18 at 13:36 -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote:

> I'd like pushing exception handlers to remain simple -- the current 
> system is almost OK. What I'd like it to change to is:
> 
>      push_eh label
> 
> with popping the top exception handler being:
> 
>      pop_eh
> 
> I'm up for better names, too.

The "push_" is okay but "eh" is meh.  push_handler seems better, though
"handler" is terribly generic.  If the documentation and comments use it
consistently only for exceptions, though, it could work.

-- c

Reply via email to