On Tue, Dec 21, 2004 at 12:56:27PM -0500, Geoffrey Young wrote: > > There's no "I want to add a new test to this test file that uses Test.pm and > > it would be nice if I could use Test::Foo" case? > > I could see this being really good for Apache-Test, which is by default > Test.pm driven. the thing is that > > - I've already ported A-T to use Test::More in place of Test.pm > > - the native implementation uses Test.pm magic like > > $Test::ntest = 1;
$Test::Legacy::ntest = 1 will DWYM. $TESTERR and $TESTOUT work, too. I should probably emphisize this in the docs as folks are going to assume it doesn't work. Test::Builder->current_test(0) will also DWYM. > %Test::todo = (); You're treading on thin ice using that from Test.pm. Even Test.pm's own tests don't use that. However, it would be trivial to make Test::Legacy support that as well. But for all Test::Builder based modules you can get the same intent with Test::Builder->reset. -- Michael G Schwern [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.pobox.com/~schwern/ ...and that, children, is how to clean and load a .38 revolver. Questions?
