> This is helpful for processing bug reports, so I don't have to make > second trip back to the user to ask: "What version of CGI.pm where you > using?".
yeah, I'll second this, at least so far as adding a version component to Test::More goes (which is different than adding a TAP version, which I don't have an opinion on:). Test.pm currently prints out # Using Test.pm version 1.24 and Apache-Test follows suit with # Using Apache/Test.pm version 1.16 and I always wished that Test::More and friends would follow suit. for instance, it might help if someone reports test failures and they're using a version of is_deeply() that has a known issue on older versions. I'll whip up a patch if folks are inclined to agree. --Geoff
