On 2005-03-08, Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 05:27:34PM +0000, Fergal Daly wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 04:56:08PM +0000, Mark Stosberg wrote:
>> > Hmm...maybe Test::Output just needs a new feature:
>> >
>> > # Because sometimes you don't care who said it.
>> > stdout_or_stderr_is()
>>
>> Test::Output allows
>>
>> my ($stdout, $stderr) = output_from {...};
>>
>> then you can do your own tests.
>
> There's no equivalent to this?
>
> my $output = `some_program 2>&1`;
>
> Where STDOUT and STDERR are combined into one stream, keeping the order
> correct.
I agree 'output_from' is not the same as what I asked for, but it's
probably good enough. I have a 50% chance of guessing which output
stream I'm reading, so the extra effort shouldn't take too long.
Mark
