From: Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2005 14:02:30 +0100
Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Syntax proposal:
> .sub foo @MULTI
> .invocant Integer a
> .invocant Float b
> .param pmc c
> ...
Alternate syntax:
.sub foo multi(Integer, Float)
.param pmc a
.param pmc b
.param pmc c
What if one wants the first and third arguments to be the invocants?
Then the first syntax gives
.sub foo @MULTI
.invocant Integer a
.param pmc b
.invocant String c
...
But it's not as obvious how to do that for the second one, unless you
use "pmc" as the explicit type name for "any":
.sub foo multi(Integer, pmc, String)
.param pmc a
.param pmc b
.param pmc c
In that case the first syntax strikes me as cleaner . . .
-- Bob Rogers
http://rgrjr.dyndns.org/
