On Mar 28, 2005, at 4:21 PM, Randy W. Sims wrote:
I think someone had proposed a year or two ago that there should be a test_requires options and I argued against it. Now, I think maybe it was a good idea; especially, since the number of extra testing modules being used have increased a lot over that time.
I think it's a good idea, although since most Perl module users run `make test` as part of the build process, I've been comfortable just putting such requirements into build_requires. But the distinction *is* significant, IME.
Regards,
David
