HaloO Larry,
you wrote:
for ordinary functions. If it gets really popular people might even start writing:
sub foo :(Str,Int) {...}
I like it, but that could mean it will not become popular :)) And this is also nice:
sub foo :(Str,Int) of Str {...}
Is a closure return type indicated with this siglet syntax, too?
sub foo :(Str,Int) of :(Any) {...}
Will there be an announcement if this syntax becomes official? BTW, would it be a good idea that you make such decisions known on p6a? -- TSa (Thomas Sandlaß)