Stevan Little <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Piers, > > On Oct 12, 2005, at 5:22 AM, Piers Cawley wrote: >> We definitely have two instances of A since, B.isa(::A). We also have >> a fragile implementation of count. > > :) > > Sorry, I purposefully made it a kludge as that is usually the way the example > is shown in most tutorials about class methods.
So, let me see if I have this straight here. You're arguing that, because people are often foolish, we should make it harder to be clever? And you're using a deliberately broken example as grist to your mill? Doesn't sound all that Perlish to me. -- Piers Cawley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.bofh.org.uk/
