-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Moin,

On Monday 14 November 2005 23:22, Adam Kennedy wrote:
> Chromatic wrote:
> > On Mon, 2005-11-14 at 12:45 -0800, Ovid wrote:
> >>Yes, I can see that.  I could actually have dropped Test::Differences
> >>"eq_or_diff" and just used the "is_deeply" function from Test::More,
> >>but when working with large data structures, there's just no
> >> comparison between the two.  I suppose I could make
> >> Test::Differences optional and fall back on is_deeply if they don't
> >> have T:D installed.
> >
> > At some point, people install modules for the convenience of not
> > writing that code themselves.  I think they'll survive if you require
> > modules for the convenience of not having to write that code
> > yourself, at least if you don't go crazy with it.
>
> The question is, what level of deps is "crazy" for something that they
> don't actually need on their computer permanently but only need for 2
> seconds to install something of yours.

This reminds me of my mini-rant about testing module dependencies. As I 
said, enjoy re-suing code, but sometimes less is more. Finding the middle 
ground is hard, but the extremes can be spotted easy. :)

Thats als why I find it really good that perl contains so many modules in 
a standard distribution, your users don't need to install tons of stuff 
just to use Foo::BAR.

Best wishes,

Tels

- -- 
 Signed on Tue Nov 15 11:13:46 2005 with key 0x93B84C15.
 Visit my photo gallery at http://bloodgate.com/photos/
 PGP key on http://bloodgate.com/tels.asc or per email.

 "Yeah, baby, yeah!"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iQEVAwUBQ3m1PncLPEOTuEwVAQEPSAf+LZzx2MUmYC4+4ixX17oQkHRAQyZ/tiG6
XywrcLBJ/nuyxFc0f9sBfIJgiD/pLUadT4Ac20F69FM0I7uUkaTQOuhzqxOAOkVR
7P3EU3i3TjKbSwg35mqmXKvwF1WT3YBJB1YQ8hzUneDnu+O8fJrMnLq+24RRgely
MkgX7hpIGmLjfPD2uhpcINi28IvzA/zlPwqydx7WiJTPF5oIdZg2pn3JS5UGlYoG
qSgzW+ZeHeo3pLGMftC7pGrEBfJpGQ5sEo4GAAbMQx/sh1yGGoNXuOXAmNL4V/fH
Kp0gNYqVMnD93LFSIqjlrRlVopFrDGupjldFQKBBZQP6b0eoadSTVA==
=arzN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to