>>>>> "demerphq" == demerphq <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
demerphq> While apparently some on this list apparently dont favour this demerphq> approach, im pretty much at a loss to come with a better way to test demerphq> the module. Did you also look at Devel::Cover, to see if your tests tickle the code paths? -- Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095 <merlyn@stonehenge.com> <URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/> Perl/Unix/security consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc. See PerlTraining.Stonehenge.com for onsite and open-enrollment Perl training!
