Hi! On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 09:51:06PM +0200, Philippe "BooK" Bruhat wrote: > Le mardi 23 mai 2006 ? 21:56, Thomas Klausner ?crivait: > > > > And no, I won't take the fun out of CPANTS. > > Then why did you filter out the Acme modules from the prereq lists? Mmm? > > For example, see http://cpants.perl.org/dist/Bot-MetaSyntactic > and http://cpants.perl.org/dist/Acme-MetaSyntactic-RefactorCode > > Both list Acme::MetaSyntactic as a prerequisite in Makefile.PL, > but it doesn't appear in the "Listed Prerequisites" nor in the > "Modules/pragmas/etc use'd by Acme-MetaSyntactic-RefactorCode" lists > (and therefore doesn't get its well earned is_prereq point).
That's a bug, not a feature :-) I'll take a look later. BTW, there seems to be quite some dists missing since I switched to the new version. But it's rather hard to find bugs etc when a complete run takes several hours... > Another side effect is that CPANTS gives false information. Thats why it says "ALPHA VERSION - Hic sunt dracones!" on every page. And "Please take all the information presented here with a grain of salt. The methods used to test the distributions are a bit flakey, and some of the Kwalitee indicators are still subjects of discussions (which should happen on the perl-qa list)." on the start page. -- #!/usr/bin/perl http://domm.zsi.at for(ref bless{},just'another'perl'hacker){s-:+-$"-g&&print$_.$/}
