On 01/07/06, Andy Lester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jul 1, 2006, at 2:45 PM, Fergal Daly wrote: > This might seem like an odd question but will it be tightly tied to > TAP or will it be possible to use another protocol or an extension to > TAP? Yes. It is about TAP. That's why it's TAP::Harness.
I'm none the wiser. So I'll just remark that, if possible, it would be nice if the protocol was pluggable, F
xoa -- Andy Lester => [EMAIL PROTECTED] => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance
