在 2006/7/12 上午 12:33 時，chromatic via RT 寫到：
Because people might write code, by hand, that does careless things in :immediate subs?
Yes. This is the difference between forcing syntax highlighters, security checkers, dependency analyzers, and refactoring browsers to run rm-rf, and let users run it.
The _entire point_ of static analysis is that you can check for errors and faults before running it, from a safe standpoint. Saying that we kill the analyzers with :immediate in an intermediate language level -- that's meant for compilers to target -- without any useful thing we know of in return, is _very_ different from arguing the same thing for Perl 5. And some of the more dangerous parts of Perl 5 BEGIN -- for example filehandles in it leaking into the generated code, or action- at-a-distance
compilation -- is considered a bug and prevented in Perl 6. Thanks, Audrey
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
