Am Donnerstag, 5. Oktober 2006 23:04 schrieb Bernhard Schmalhofer: > Shouldn't this field be renamed to something like 'checksum' ? The term > 'UUID' already has a specific meaning, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UUID.
Indeed. But we probably want to have an UUID to identify loaded .pasm/.pir/.pbc to avoid loading duplicates. As a side note: distinct PBC segments for checksum and/or UUID is probably simpler to handle. > CU, Bernhard leo
