On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 01:10:11PM -0800, Klaas-Jan Stol via RT wrote: > On Wed Sep 05 12:58:32 2007, bernhard wrote: > > > > > thanks for the quick turnaround. this test is perfect for the > > > 'executed from pir test case', and will be applied shortly. > > The test case has been added in r21092. > > > > > but as > > > patrick later provided an example of executing a .pbc file, we'll also > > > need a test for this before the ticket is closed. > > I propose to close this ticket, as running the PIR and PASM test by > > generating first PBC is issue of RT#41666. > > > > The good news is that it really works: > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/devel/Parrot/repos/parrot$ ./parrot -o t.pbc > > t/pmc/objects_78.pir > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/devel/Parrot/repos/parrot$ ./parrot t.pbc > > Hello world > > Hello world > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/devel/Parrot/repos/parrot$ ./parrot > > t/pmc/objects_78.pir > > Hello world > > Hello world > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/devel/Parrot/repos/parrot$ > > > > > > > > Any comments? > > Bernhard > > It seems all issues discussed in this ticket have been resolved, afaict. > Can this ticket be closed?
I vote yes. If there's another problem with this issue we should open a new ticket. Pm
