On Sun Mar 16 10:02:32 2008, rgrjr wrote: > I think it ought to happen, though I think Allison just wanted a ticket > for updating existing PDDs, and not for a whole new PDD. I asked > Allison for a clarification on 11-Mar in Will's "[oops; continuation > 0xb6926320 of type 22 is trying to jump from runloop 15008 to runloop > 1]" thread, and had been waiting for that. > > But I do agree that it ought to be a separate ticket. The underlying > issue is still with us, but has outgrown the original ticket. >
Okay. I will now close this ticket. For more granular tracking, I recommend that a separate RT be opened for each existing PDD which needs updating. Thank you very much. kid51
