HaloO, Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH wrote:
It occurs to me that this shouldn't be new keywords, but adverbs, i.e. ``is :strict Dog''.
Great idea! But aren't named args required to be after required ones? That is we have "is Dog :strict"? I would actually like to relax the syntax if that were possible because e.g. '3 == log:base(2) 8' looks more natural than '3 == log 8 :base(2)'. Or '3.001 ==:eps(0.1) 3.01'. Regards, TSa. -- "The unavoidable price of reliability is simplicity" -- C.A.R. Hoare 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + ... = -1/12 -- Srinivasa Ramanujan
