On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 11:00 AM, Will Coleda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 5:00 AM, Allison Randal via RT > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> In r29934 of the branch, I can't even get tcl to build, it keeps >> complaining about calls to tcl_error_s which it says doesn't exist. >> Since you mentioned you were eliminating the versions of tcl_error >> identical to 'die', I went through and replaced the calls to tcl_error >> with calls to die. It builds now, but some tests are failing because of >> empty exception handler messages. >> > > Thanks for the fixup on the tcl_error/die. > > When I run make test now, the first failure is in t/cmd_cd.t. > > $ prove -v t/cmd_cd.t > t/cmd_cd...... > 1..3 > not ok 1 - cd too many args > > # Failed test 'cd too many args' > # at t/cmd_cd.t line 16. > # got: '' > # expected: 'wrong # args: should be "cd ?dirName?" > # ' > # '../../parrot ./tcl.pbc t/cmd_cd_1.tcl' failed with exit code [SIGNAL 11] > > That is just the tcl "cd a b", so if we just run: > > $ ../../parrot tcl.pbc -e 'cd a b' > Segmentation fault > > Seems to be the same backtrace as above. > > Where are the failures you're seeing with empty exception handler > messages? I'm consistently seeing segfaults for the failures, and > they all seem to be related to exception handling. (And are these > really the same error failing differently?) > > -- > Will "Coke" Coleda >
If I put in a 'trace 1' immediately before the die in runtime/builtin/cd.pir, I see the following: $ ../../parrot tcl.pbc - e 'cd a b' 16152 die "wrong # args: should" 411 set I6, P9["severity"] I6=-888 P9=Exception=PMC(0x83fc608) 415 eq I6, 6, 58 I6=2 419 set I6, -1 I6=2 422 push_eh 7 424 set I6, P9["type"] I6=-1 P9=Exception=PMC(0x83fc608) 428 pop_eh 429 eq I6, 60, 18 I6=61 433 eq I6, 59, 27 I6=61 437 set S6, P9["stacktrace"] S6="tcl.pbc" P9=Exception=PMC(0x83fc608) -- Will "Coke" Coleda
