2008/8/5 Will Coleda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > So these branch commands actually create branches on the svn > repository that's doing the hosting, so they're defacto shared with > the community in the obvious location? (presuming you're online and > pushing changes back?) > > That seems to be the best of both worlds, presuming it handles the > merging better/faster/cleaner than 'svn merge' does.
But this is only the best for committers. For non-committers who would have to wait longer time to get their patches applied it would be better to use a git branch and merge it more often to get in the upstream updates. Like my bigger patches, which are often heavily outdated by other changes when they are applied. -- Reini Urban http://phpwiki.org/ http://murbreak.at/
