On Friday 15 August 2008 09:07:46 Geoffrey Broadwell wrote: > It seems then that we have two remaining options: > > 1. Don't run codingstd as part of smolder. > > 2. Differentiate a codingstd failure and a "real" failure in smolder. > > Which one of these are you proposing?
+1 to either. #1 seems slightly easier (no changes to Smolder). -- c
