A few people have asked about submitting patches via the "fork queue" on GitHub; after working with the queue this morning and largely being frustrated by it, I'm going to request that patches continue to be submitted as patches through RT.
The biggest difficulty that I'm encounter with the fork queue is that developers (understandably) will develop something in their local repository as a series of small commits, but it's hard for me review and evaluate the end result as a unit. In other words, the commit list in the queue contains all of the false starts and retractions, making it very difficult to see what was done. It's also more difficult to comment on any particular set of commits, e.g. to ask that something be revised or factored in a different manner. So, for the time being Rakudo's official policy will be to accept patch submissions via RT. I've now cleared the fork queue on GitHub; any patches that were previously there need to be resubmitted. Hopefully someone can update the README and github wiki pages with a good procedure for generating patch files for Rakudo. (The current README suggests git-format-patch, but this also apparently produces a series of small patch files which are equally difficult to review.) Or, if someone can point me to a guide or sequence that describes how to make handling the fork queue or multiple patch submissions easier for the maintainers to review, I'll reconsider the policy. Thanks, Pm