Nick Ing-Simmons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> John Tobey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> That sounds like a pre-judgement that inline form is prefered ;-)
> >> But actually most places (I looked when doing TIEARAY) perl itself calls
> >> nether it uses AvFILL() macro instead.
> >
> >As I understand myself, AvFILL == i_av_fill, so thank you for
> >confirming my pre-judgment. :-)
>
> No - one more time - your prejudgement may match perl5 - my point is
> PERL5 GOT IT WRONG (I think, and other hardware aware types Alan, Dan, ...
> seem to agree).
Ah, okay. You mean perl5 got it wrong. I'm no CPU architect, as you
may have noticed. I'm merely reporting what I've observed in perl5.
Thanks for clarifying this.
-John
> It may have been right for a 3MHz 68000 based Sun3 but it isn't for
> UltraSPARC, Pentium-III, IA-64, ...
>
> --
> Nick Ing-Simmons
>
>
