Re: A tentative list of vtable functions

[Dan Sugalski]

At 04:59 PM 8/31/00 -0400, Buddha Buck wrote:
>At 04:43 PM 8/31/00 -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote:
>>Okay, here's a list of functions I think should go into variable vtables. 
>>Functions marked with a * will take an optional type offset so we can 
>>handle asking for various permutations of the basic type.
>
>Perhaps I'm missing something...  Is this for scalars alone?  I see no 
>arrays/hashes here.

Gah. It's supposed to be for all types. I'll dredge together the bits for 
arrays and hashes and wedge them in too.

                                        Dan

--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski                          even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]                         have teddy bears and even
                                      teddy bears get drunk