On Wed, 13 Sep 2000, Nathan Torkington wrote:
> Simon Cozens writes:
> > > Nice!
> > Efficient!
> > Practical!
> >
> > Choose two.
>
> I take this oblique comment to mean that it'd bloat the op-tree too
> much?
Well, suppose we simply add the -FOO (choose your letter) flag to
perl...-FOO is a toned-down -d in that it produces a debug version with
bloated op-trees, but having these bloated op-trees allows it to emit more
useful warnings/errors. When you want it to run faster, you turn off -FOO
and it runs faster. (Actually, -FOO should probably be _on_ by default
and be something that you turn _off_ as an optimization, once your script
is ready to roll.)
Dave
- Re: RFC 214 (v1) Emit warnings... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 214 (v1) Emit warnings... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 214 (v1) Emit warnings and... Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 214 (v1) Emit warnings... Steve Fink
- Re: RFC 214 (v1) Emit warnings... Dave Storrs
- Re: RFC 214 (v1) Emit warnings... Steve Fink
- Re: RFC 214 (v1) Emit warnings... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 214 (v1) Emit warnings... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 214 (v1) Emit warnings and... Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC 214 (v1) Emit warnings and errors b... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 214 (v1) Emit warnings and errors b... Dave Storrs
- Re: RFC 214 (v1) Emit warnings and errors based on unopt... Dan Sugalski
