Dan Sugalski wrote:
> At 07:38 PM 9/28/00 +0000, Perl6 RFC Librarian wrote:
> >These APIs should be documented separately from the implementation, in a
> >language-independent and an object-oriented way.
>
> Unfortunately the two conflict. C, APL, Fortran, and COBOL aren't
> particularly object-oriented...
But those are implementation languages. UML is object oriented,
and [i]language independent; a design expressed in UML could be
implemented in a non-OO language.
> I think, though, that the core interface should be procedural.
I agree. We should not confuse OOD with OOP.
--
John Porter
Jetzt schalten wir das Radio an. Aus dem Lautsprecher klingt es dann...
- RFC 125 (v2) Components in the Perl Core Should Have W... Perl6 RFC Librarian
- Re: RFC 125 (v2) Components in the Perl Core Shou... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 125 (v2) Components in the Perl Core ... John Porter
- Re: RFC 125 (v2) Components in the Perl C... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 125 (v2) Components in the Pe... Peter Buckingham
- Re: RFC 125 (v2) Components in t... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 125 (v2) Components ... Peter Buckingham
- Re: RFC 125 (v2) Components in the Pe... John Porter
- RE: RFC 125 (v2) Components in t... Peter Buckingham
- Re: RFC 125 (v2) Components ... 'John Porter'
- Re: RFC 125 (v2) Compone... Bart Schuller
- Re: RFC 125 (v2) Compone... Tim Bunce
- Re: RFC 125 (v2) Compone... Sam Tregar
