At 10:32 AM 9/29/00 -0700, Peter Buckingham wrote:
>Dan Sugalski wrote:
> >
> > At 04:17 PM 9/28/00 -0400, John Porter wrote:
> > > > I think, though, that the core interface should be procedural.
> > >
> > >I agree. We should not confuse OOD with OOP.
> >
> > Fair enough, and I was.
> >
> > I've no experience with UML, though. Got a pointer to a quick overview?
>
>Try Martin Fowler's UML Distilled, very good and short!
Is it available electronically, or do I need to trot over to Quantum Books
and drop some cash on it? (Man, they love me there...) If it's paper, got
an ISBN?
Dan
--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk
- RFC 125 (v2) Components in the Perl Core Should Have W... Perl6 RFC Librarian
- Re: RFC 125 (v2) Components in the Perl Core Shou... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 125 (v2) Components in the Perl Core ... John Porter
- Re: RFC 125 (v2) Components in the Perl C... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 125 (v2) Components in the Pe... Peter Buckingham
- Re: RFC 125 (v2) Components in t... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 125 (v2) Components ... Peter Buckingham
- Re: RFC 125 (v2) Components in the Pe... John Porter
- RE: RFC 125 (v2) Components in t... Peter Buckingham
- Re: RFC 125 (v2) Components ... 'John Porter'
- Re: RFC 125 (v2) Compone... Bart Schuller
- Re: RFC 125 (v2) Compone... Tim Bunce
- Re: RFC 125 (v2) Compone... Sam Tregar
- Re: RFC 125 (v2) Components ... Johan Vromans
- Re: RFC 125 (v2) Components in t... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 125 (v2) Components ... Philip Newton
