At 01:38 PM 3/2/2001 -0800, Hong Zhang wrote: > > I was hoping to get us something that was guaranteed to hold an integer, >no > > matter what it was, so you could do something like: > > > > struct thingie { > > UV type; > > INT my_int; > > } > >What is the purpose of doing this? At this point none, since I've seen the error of my ways and have stricken that bit from the PDD. :) I was thinking it would be useful for code that needed to operate on bare perl integers, but that thought wasn't fully thought out. Dan --------------------------------------"it's like this"------------------- Dan Sugalski even samurai [EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even teddy bears get drunk
- Re: PDD 4: Internal data types Andy Dougherty
- Re: PDD 4: Internal data types Dan Sugalski
- Re: PDD 4: Internal data types Nicholas Clark
- Re: PDD 4: Internal data types Dan Sugalski
- Re: PDD 4: Internal data types Uri Guttman
- Re: PDD 4: Internal data types Hong Zhang
- Re: PDD 4: Internal data types Dan Sugalski
- Re: PDD 4: Internal data types Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: PDD 4: Internal data types Dan Sugalski
- Re: PDD 4: Internal data types Hong Zhang
- Re: PDD 4: Internal data types Dan Sugalski
- Re: PDD 4: Internal data types Hong Zhang
- Re: PDD 4: Internal data types Dan Sugalski
- Re: PDD 4: Internal data types Hong Zhang
- Re: PDD 4: Internal data types Dan Sugalski
- Re: PDD 4: Internal data types Hong Zhang
- Re: PDD 4: Internal data types Dan Sugalski
- Re: PDD 4: Internal data types Paolo Molaro
- Re: PDD 4: Internal data types David Mitchell
- Re: PDD 4: Internal data types Dan Sugalski
- Re: PDD 4: Internal data types Nicholas Clark