David L . Nicol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote: > >> Some sort of simple markup embedded within the C comments. Hey, let's >> extend pod! Hey, let's use XML! Hey, let's use SGML! Hey, let's use >> XHTML! Hey, let's use lout! Hey, ... > >Either run pod through a pod puller before the C preprocessor gets to >the code, or figure out a set of macros that can quote and ignore pod. > >The second is Yet Another Halting Problem so we go with the first? > >Which means a little program to depod the source before building it, >or a -HASPOD extension to gcc > >Or just getting in the habit of writing > >/* >=pod > > >and > >=cut >*/ Perhaps we could teach pod that /* was alias for =pod and */ an alias for =cut ? -- Nick Ing-Simmons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Via, but not speaking for: Texas Instruments Ltd.
- Re: PDD for code comments ???? Simon Cozens
- Re: PDD for code comments ???? Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: PDD for code comments ???? Simon Cozens
- Re: PDD for code comments ???? Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: PDD for code comments ???? David L. Nicol
- Re: PDD for code comments ???? David Mitchell
- Re: PDD for code comments ???? Nicholas Clark
- Re: PDD for code comments ???? Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: PDD for code comments ???? David L. Nicol
- Re: PDD for code comments ???? David Mitchell
- Re: PDD for code comments ???? Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: PDD for code comments ???? Dave Mitchell
- Re: PDD for code comments ???? Dan Sugalski
- Re: PDD for code comments ???? David L. Nicol
- Re: PDD for code comments ???? Simon Cozens
- Re: PDD for code comments ???? nick
- Re: PDD for code comments ???? Dave Mitchell
- Re: PDD for code comments ???? Dan Sugalski
- Re: PDD for code comments ???? Dan Sugalski