At 02:58 PM 3/26/2001 +0100, Dave Mitchell wrote: >Nick Ing-Simmons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> opined: > > Perhaps we could teach pod that /* was alias for =pod > > and */ an alias for =cut ? > >or possibly > >/*=foo is an alias for =foo, >and */ is an alias for =cut only after a /*= has been encountered. I think I'd rather we built a simple extractor rather than teach pod about how to extract itself from C comments, but if we're going to do that, tell it that */ is an alias for =cut, and that it should strip out leading /* on lines... Dan --------------------------------------"it's like this"------------------- Dan Sugalski even samurai [EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even teddy bears get drunk
- Re: PDD for code comments ???? Simon Cozens
- Re: PDD for code comments ???? Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: PDD for code comments ???? David L. Nicol
- Re: PDD for code comments ???? David Mitchell
- Re: PDD for code comments ???? Nicholas Clark
- Re: PDD for code comments ???? Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: PDD for code comments ???? David L. Nicol
- Re: PDD for code comments ???? David Mitchell
- Re: PDD for code comments ???? Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: PDD for code comments ???? Dave Mitchell
- Re: PDD for code comments ???? Dan Sugalski
- Re: PDD for code comments ???? David L. Nicol
- Re: PDD for code comments ???? Simon Cozens
- Re: PDD for code comments ???? nick
- Re: PDD for code comments ???? Dave Mitchell
- Re: PDD for code comments ???? Dan Sugalski
- Re: PDD for code comments ???? Dan Sugalski