On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 08:37:05PM +0000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >If ord is dependent on the encoding of the string it gets, as Dan
> >was saying, than ord($e) is 0x81,
>
> It it could still be 0x81 (from ebcdic) with the encoding carried
> along with the _number_ if we thought that worth the trouble.
I'm going to go away and whimper in pain for a bit, now.
"I thought chr(0x61) was 'a'." "It is, but that's an EBCDIC number."
- Damien
- RE: Unicode handling Dan Sugalski
- Re: Unicode handling nick
- Re: Unicode handling Dan Sugalski
- Re: Unicode handling nick
- Re: Unicode handling Damien Neil
- Re: Unicode handling Dan Sugalski
- Re: Unicode handling nick
- Re: Unicode handling nick
- Re: Unicode handling Damien Neil
- Re: Unicode handling nick
- RE: Unicode handling Damien Neil
- RE: Unicode handling Garrett Goebel
- Re: Unicode handling Larry Wall
- Re: Unicode handling Dan Sugalski
- Re: Unicode handling Dan Sugalski
- Re: Unicode handling Damien Neil
- Re: Unicode handling Larry Wall
- Re: Unicode handling Hong Zhang
- Re: Unicode handling Dan Sugalski
- Re: Unicode handling Dan Sugalski
- Re: Unicode handling Larry Wall
